search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content
Hidden camera lens exposed
Abuse Guardians
+1 (877) 421-9608

Belton, TX – A former Belton ISD teacher has been arrested and charged in connection with recordings of multiple female students made without their knowledge. Officials confirmed that 39-year-old Pietro Victor Giustino was taken into custody on Monday in Bexar County on two warrants for state-jail felony invasive visual recording.

Teacher Taken Into Custody in Bexar County in Connection to Federal Child Exploitation Case

The new charges trace back to a separate federal investigation. In July, Giustino was arrested by the FBI for allegedly possessing and attempting to possess child sexual abuse material. Federal prosecutors stated that the materials involved minors, but none of the victims were local Belton students.

Cellphone Videos Lead to New Allegations

During the federal investigation, FBI agents uncovered 13 cellphone videos. These clips were turned over to Belton police, who determined they showed “invasive visual recordings of several female students without their apparent knowledge.” Working with school staff, investigators were able to identify the girls as students of Belton High School, where Giustino was previously employed.

School and Police Notify Parents After Videos Surface of Female Students

Authorities and district officials have notified the families of students appearing in the recordings. Belton police said that parents who have not been contacted should assume their children are not involved.

Giustino Awaiting Transfer After Arrest

Giustino remains in custody following his most recent arrest and is expected to be transferred to Bell County Jail at a later date.

Legal Options for Families After Teacher Abuse

Families reeling from the arrest of former Belton ISD teacher Pietro Victor Giustino are left grappling with questions about accountability and recovery. Texas lawyer Anjali Nigam discusses the legal avenues available to students and their families, from criminal actions against the offender to potential civil claims aimed at supporting victims and holding institutions responsible.

Laurence Banville, Esq.: With incidents like this happening in a high school setting, what legal steps are available for students and their families?

Anjali Nigam, Esq.: Families can take both criminal and civil action. The state is already prosecuting Mr. Giustino on felony charges, but the students involved may also have grounds for civil claims against him directly. Beyond that, they could potentially bring claims against the school district if there was any failure to protect them or to act on warning signs.

Banville: So this could mean more than just holding the individual accountable?

Nigam: Exactly. Civil lawsuits can help victims and their families recover damages for emotional trauma, counseling costs, and long-term impacts. While criminal prosecution focuses on punishment, civil actions aim to provide meaningful recovery for those harmed.

Banville: For parents who are unsure right now, what should they do?

Nigam: Consulting with an attorney experienced in abuse cases is a safe step. Early legal guidance can help families understand their rights, evaluate the facts, and ensure their children’s well-being is prioritized.

Support and Guidance for Families

Students and families impacted by teacher abuse deserve to have their voices heard and their rights protected. If you believe your child may have been affected, our legal team is here to help. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your options and take the first step toward accountability and recovery.

Source

https://www.fox7austin.com/news/pietro-victor-giustino-invasive-visual-recording-charges-belton-texas

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Please do not include personal details in your comment. To message the author privately instead, click here.

Contacting the author via this website, either publicly or privately, does not create an attorney–client privilege.